A Cry For Justice

Awakening the Evangelical Church to Domestic Violence and Abuse in its Midst

Evil is Using “Unconditional Respect” to Hide Itself Among us. And questions about the case of Ps Tom Chantry.

UPDATE  Sept 2021:  Barbara Roberts has come to believe that Jeff Crippen does not practise what he preaches.  He vilely persecuted an abuse victim and spiritually abused many other people in the Tillamook congregation. Go here to read the evidence. Jeff has not gone to the people that he spiritually and emotionally abused. He has not apologised to them, let alone asked for their forgiveness.


In a recent post we dealt with a typical distortion of Scripture which insists that a wife must respect her husband no matter what he does, no matter what kind of person he is. Respect. Obey. Honor. We saw that such mishandling of Scripture is very common. We saw how it hooks out a precept from God’s Word and turns it into absolute, unbending principle that supposedly applies no matter what.

Jesus exposed this kind of evil distortion of God’s word among the religious leaders of His day when they were turning the Sabbath into a heavy burden —

At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath. His disciples were hungry, and they began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. But when the Pharisees saw it, they said to him, “Look, your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath.” He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, and those who were with him: how he entered the house of God and ate the bread of the Presence, which it was not lawful for him to eat nor for those who were with him, but only for the priests? Or have you not read in the Law how on the Sabbath the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and are guiltless? I tell you, something greater than the temple is here. And if you had known what this means, ‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the guiltless. For the Son of Man is lord of the Sabbath.” (Matthew 12:1-8, emphasis added)

Now, here is an incredibly evil thing that these “unconditional” lies effect among us. When we are taught, and when it is enforced, that the Christian must NEVER speak negatively about those God says we are to honor and respect and obey, evil is using its darkness to hide in our pews and homes. Evil is of the realm of the kingdom of darkness. Secrecy. Hiding. Deception. And what better gimmick to remain unseen, appearing as some angel of light or a wolf disguised as a sheep, than to convince everyone in the church that evil can never be spoken of, pointed out, called to accounts, especially when it is seen in those we are to “unconditionally respect”!!

We all know it’s true. Christians are being taught and commanded that they must NEVER “speak against” a pastor, a church elder, a church member (especially if such member is a supposed ‘pillar’ of the church), a Christian author, a Christian ministry leader, a husband (we would include “wife” here too but the fact is that it is often much more permissible for a husband to speak of his ‘cranky’ wife than for a Christian wife to expose her husband’s sins), a parent…and so on. To say something negative about such a person is said to be gossip, slander, breaking the ninth commandment, speaking “against the Lord’s anointed” and so forth.

An example within Reformed Baptist circles

Recently it has become public information (see here) that pastor Tom Chantry, a “notable and respected” Reformed Baptist leader has been charged in the state of Arizona with five counts of molestation of a child (the five counts relate to two minors), and three counts of aggravated assault on three separate minors as well. The events are alleged to have occurred in 1995, 1996, and 1998–2001. We do not know which years pertain to the alleged molestations and which pertain to the aggravated assaults, so we caution readers to make no assumptions about which years pertain to which charges.

The secular justice system works like this: anyone charged under the criminal code is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and the alleged offender is only convicted when the evidence is judged to be ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. That’s how the criminal justice system works. (At least, that’s how it’s supposed to work.) The prosecution’s case against Tom Chantry case must comply with those principles. And the New Testament tells Christians to recognise and respect the responsibility and the role of secular governments in the delivery of justice (Romans 13).

But Christians are required to pay attention to more principles than just the ones which govern the secular system. We are going to explore some of those principles in this post.

We have no doubt that we are going to learn that quite a number of church leaders knew about at least some of the allegations years ago, before Chantry was arrested in July this year. We think it highly likely that even now, with the charges having been laid, some church members are being told things like:

  • We must not speak of these things or we will be guilty of gossip.
  • The ninth commandment says you must not bear false witness against your neighbor, so any speech, especially public speech, about this case is wrong.
  • We must respect Chantry because he is a fellow Christian and a pastor.
  • Respect means BE QUIET! (this does not have to be said in words; it can be conveyed by a frown or a glare)

Here is a very typical lashback at someone who works to expose evil:

“Any discussion about this is gossip. There is nothing here that should be exposed.”

“ANY discussion. ANY questions. So just…shut up.”  To expose evil in the church is gossip, you see. The fangs quickly come out and snarl those kinds of words. But the Lord says—

Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. (Eph 5:11)

The website of the church which Chantry has pastored for the last ten years or so—Christ Reformed Baptist Church, Hales Corners, Milwaukee, Wisconsin—says he is on ‘leave of absence’ (link). Here is a screen shot from the church’s website.

If you click on the screen shot it will enlarge. You will see that since leaving the pastoral position in Arizona, Chantry spent four years teaching in a Christian school in Chicago, and has been a pastor in at least one other church.

We wonder if Chantry is on paid or unpaid leave. We wonder why the church website does not state that Chantry’s leave of absence is related to him having been arrested and charged on multiple criminal charges. We wonder why the church website does not inform the church members about the charges which Chantry is facing.

Journalist Tiffany Stoiber writes:

According to a police report filed in January 2016, an elder of the church  [Christ Reformed Baptist Church in Hales Corners, Prescott, Arizona] reported that Chantry had, during a private meeting, admitted to spanking some kids at the church and said that “maybe he had taken it too far.” He added that Chantry apologized to one of the families and left the town a few days after.

Once Chantry left, the same report said, “more allegations from other victims was (sic) revealed.” The elder said that a committee of church association members investigated the claims, which included interviewing every adult and child at the church about their contact with Chantry.

After the church investigation, the elder said in the report that other elders, parents, and other church members were “not happy with the end result.” He added that the church association told parents about their options, including reporting the incidents to law enforcement; however, it seems that no families contacted the police at that time.

The first report of these incidents to law enforcement, according to police records, was not until July 2015.

Chantry was arrested in July 2016, and now, December, the indictments have been announced (court record details here or do your own search here by writing Chantry, Thomas , Prescott Court into the appropriate fields.

Scripture requires that a man be “above reproach” to be a shepherd in Christ’s church

… appoint elders in every town as I directed you—if anyone is above reproach, … not open to the charge of debauchery or insubordination. For an overseer, as God’s steward, must be above reproach. He must not be arrogant or quick-tempered or a drunkard or violent or greedy for gain, but hospitable, a lover of good, self-controlled, upright, holy, and disciplined. …
For there are many who are insubordinate, empty talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision party. They must be silenced, since they are upsetting whole families by teaching for shameful gain what they ought not to teach. One of the Cretans, a prophet of their own, said, “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons.” This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith … To the pure, all things are pure, but to the defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure; but both their minds and their consciences are defiled. They profess to know God, but they deny him by their works. They are detestable, disobedient, unfit for any good work. (Titus 1:9-16 ESV emphasis added)

Therefore an overseer must be above reproach, … sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not a drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. … Moreover, he must be well thought of by outsiders, so that he may not fall into disgrace, into a snare of the devil. (1 Tim 3:2-7 emphasis added)

Do not admit a charge against an elder except on the evidence of two or three witnesses. As for those [elders] who persist in sin, rebuke them in the presence of all, so that the rest may stand in fear. In the presence of God and of Christ Jesus and of the elect angels I charge you to keep these rules without prejudging, doing nothing from partiality. (1 Tim 5:19-21, emphasis added)

Some questions about the Tom Chantry case

By listing these questions we are not implying that we know any of the answers. Nor are our questions pointing to or hinting at any snippets of the truth. Our list of questions is not exhaustive, and it is not meant to be used to infer how to join dots and so find out the truth. But they are legitimate questions to ask.

Five key questions:

  1. When did church authorities first become aware of an allegation or allegations against Chantry, made by one or more of the children or their caregivers?
  2. When church authorities became aware, what did they do about it?
  3. How long was Chantry allowed to remain a pastor after allegations became known?
  4. When church authorities became aware that Chantry had been arrested in July this year, what did they do about it?
  5. Since the indictments have been spelled out this December, what have church authorities been doing about it?

Thirteen subsidiary / more detailed questions

  1. If Tiffany Stoiber’s report is correct and elders, parents, and other church members were “not happy with the end result” of the Church Association’s investigation, how come Chantry was able to go on pastoring in other churches and teaching in a school?
  2. If Tiffany Stoiber’s report is correct, how could the representatives of the Church Association which investigated the claims back in year x (whatever year they did their investigation) not feel duty bound to report the allegations to the police?
  3. If Tiffany Stoiber’s report is correct that Chantry had “admitted to spanking some kids at the church and said that ‘maybe he had taken it too far’  … apologized to one of the families and left the town a few days after” — is it likely that Chantry was above reproach from then on?
  4. A pastor who admits to ‘maybe’ spanking kids too hard and apologises to one (but not all) of the families and leaves town a few days after — is there not a question mark over his reputation, by (a) his own admission and (b) the fact that he skipped town so rapidly?
  5. How could any later churches Chantry pastored after he left Arizona be confident he was above reproach?
  6. Did the unhappy church in Arizona get the opportunity to pass on to other churches their warning about Chantry — how and why they thought he was not above reproach?
  7. Did the Arizona church try to tell others in their stream of Christendom, only to find their testimony discounted?
  8. What did the Church Association Representatives who investigated Chantry’s Arizona conduct do? Or not do?
  9. What did the other churches who were members of that Church Association get told?
  10. If those other churches were told anything, what did they then do or not do?
  11. Why didn’t the wider church get warned about Chantry?
  12. After Chantry was arrested this July, did the leaders at the church where Chantry was pastor and the leaders at places where Chantry he had worked before tell their flocks immediately?
  13. In cases like this, the congregation has a right to know early on because they need to re-examine what they have been listening to. If a man has been preaching to others week after week but has been evading responsibility for crimes against children, wouldn’t he have been interpreting Scripture through self-justifying lenses? And therefore, wouldn’t that preaching have been endangering the flock?

Since Chantry has been charged with child abuse, it is VERY important to inform all the parents of families Chantry has pastored or taught. By knowing that information, parents may be able to care for their children more wisely. And informing parents sooner rather than later may give rise to more information being reported to the secular prosecuting authorities — information which could enable justice to be done.

Here is part of a statement made by David Clohessy, Director of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, in relation to Tom Chantry’s indictment:

… now is not the time for complacency. An arrest is not a conviction. Many times, we see shrewd predators get expensive lawyers and exploit technicalities, escaping convictions or long sentences. Then, sometimes they assault more kids.

So we call on Chantry’s current and former church supervisors, colleagues and members in Wisconsin and Arizona to use pulpit announcements, bulletin notices and church mailings to help law enforcement prosecute Rev. Chantry and seek out – and help – others he may have hurt.

These churches gave Chantry access to kids. So their civic and moral duty doesn’t end with his arrest. …

Ministers call themselves “shepherds.” In cases like this, a caring shepherd admits there are likely other “lost sheep” out there, suffering in silence, shame and self-blame. He or she would use every possible method of reaching out to them – church signs, bulletins, mailings and pulpit announcements. Instead, most ministers do little but focus on protecting themselves from criticism and litigation. We hope this doesn’t happen here.

Jeff Crippen’s experience of ARBCA

In the past couple of years I (Jeff Crippen) had some conversations with several pastors whose churches (like mine) were formerly members of ARBCA (Association of Reformed Baptist Churches in America). When our churches were members of ARBCA there was huge turmoil and division over what I consider to be, at best, a third-level doctrinal issue (at least, that was the STATED issue).  The doctrinal issue, divine impassibility, was being elevated by the Theology Committee and Association Council to the level of a definitive doctrine to go to the wall for, and which must be adhered to or a person/church would be put out of the association. Many, many pastors and churches and missionaries left ARBCA as a result.

As I spoke with these pastors who left ARBCA, at least three of them who were “in the know” said that they had seen evil at work in all this. AND YET THEY WOULD NEVER SAY SO PUBLICLY. At all of their meetings, in all their larger circle discussions of the matter, they would call this whole thing “a sad disagreement among Christian brothers.” Those who went on to hold organizational meetings for a new association would start off their meetings with something like, “Now, we don’t want to speak negatively at this meeting. We don’t want to say anything negative about our brothers in the Lord. We don’t want to dwell on that.” So any and all discussion of the possibility of EVIL having been at work among us was effectively squelched. They did not learn their lesson, and they are destined to repeat the very same allowance of wickedness to assault them again from within.

There is a Code of Silence taught and enforced in the church and Evil is hiding out because of it.

The Code-of-Silence dynamic works constantly in our churches. It is the ugly sister of the more genteel-looking Tone Police. Wives must never speak negatively of their husbands and if they do—even if they are reporting rank domestic abuse—they are often silenced with the accusation that they are sinning by disrespecting their husband. Children are taught to obey their parents, and rightfully so; but even that obedience does not mean unconditional obedience no matter what a parent does. Family secrets lie buried. Church secrets lie buried.

How do you think that pedophiles so successfully continue to work in the flock? The signs are seen. The revelations are (sometimes, eventually) made by victims, but the matter is consistently hushed up. “Oh, we must not think such things about a brother in Christ. That man is a pastor, God’s anointed. Where are the multiple witnesses you need? Don’t ever say such things again.” Or else they “tell you about your options, including reporting the incidents to law enforcement” but they don’t report it to law enforcement themselves, even if as ministers they are mandated by law to do so. And people like this don’t offer to support you if you decide to report it to the police. If you look like you might be thinking of going to the police, they give you cold vibes, to deter you.

There is a Code of Silence taught and enforced in the church and Evil is hiding out because of it.

This code of silence is promoted by false teachings on “unconditional” respect, obedience, love, forgiveness, patience, yada, yada, yada.  This is how false sheep / shepherds successfully continue their masquerade.

Years back when I (Jeff) was just beginning my sermon series on domestic abuse hiding in the church, the series that led to the book A Cry for Justice [*Affiliate link] (you can still access that sermon series here), I met strong resistance immediately. A man who was an elder in our church and who is no longer in our church, how shall I say it, “freaked out” in anger. He tried to stop me from preaching that series. He threw fits at elder meetings, making accusations of unforgiveness against us. The Code of Silence, you see. By God’s grace it didn’t work — and A Cry for Justice as a ministry began.

It is long past time for us to stop being silenced by this wicked Code. This is what needs to happen. Christ’s Word needs to be spoken once again, and when it is we will be astonished because it has been sooo long since we heard it:

And when Jesus finished these sayings, the crowds were astonished at his teaching, for he was teaching them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes. (Matthew 7:28-29)

UPDATE: Todd Wilhelm included the full text of our post in his article Quiet! Don’t Break the Ninth Commandment! (Jan 2017). Todd was challenging R Scott Clark and others who were admonishing bloggers for writing about the sins of men like Tom Chantry and Tulllian Tchividjian.

*Amazon affiliate link — ACFJ gets a small percentage if you purchase via this link.


Further Reading

Does the Bible Command Us to Respect No Matter What

The Abuser’s Evil Demands for Secrecy

Getting “Gossip” Wrong Will Silence Voices Exposing Evil

God’s Rules of Evidence are Often Misapplied, to the Harm of Abuse Victims

Abuse and Secrecy: What Have We Got to Hide?

Wise as Serpents: “Keep it Secret, Keep it Safe” – Darkness and Secrecy are Part of the Very Essence of Evil (Part 17 of sermon series)


  1. debby

    We are so trained. Sigh…(I speak from my own 35 years of misplaced loyalty and misunderstood scripture). Anyway, I thought it was interesting when you quoted “Moreover, he must be well thought of by outsiders.” Outsiders maybe meaning people who would not be afraid to think or speak the truth? That an “insider” would fall into the lie of “no talking or exposing because that would be bad?” Interesting choice of words.

  2. Thanks so much for this report and the *extremely* important topic of shining the light on evil and the evil-enablers. That cannot be emphasized enough.

    By the way, it looks like Tom Chantry must be the son of Walter Chantry, whose book “Today’s Gospel: Authentic or Synthetic?” was an important help to Tim and me back in our pilgrimage in the 1990s and our very brief stint in the Reformed Baptist denomination. But just as R.C. Sproul Sr needed to allow his son to be exposed, the same would be true here. Allegations against a man must not be covered up just because his dad is in a position of preeminence.

    • Jeff Crippen

      Yes, he is the son of Walter Chantry. As much as fathers love their sons, we must never let that love be misguided so that we become Eli who feared his sons more than he feared the Lord.

      • As much as fathers love their sons, we must never let that love be misguided so that we become Eli who feared his sons more than he feared the Lord.

        Yes. And that dynamic is the kind of thing Paul is referring to in 1 Tim 5:21 which we quoted in this post.

        In the presence of God and of Christ Jesus and of the elect angels I charge you to keep these rules without prejudging, doing nothing from partiality.

  3. Lea

    A lot of people running around twitter saying he is innocent until proven guilty. Legally, yes.

    In reality, he is either innocent or guilty. Legal proof or absence of it does not change what happened! You may believe him to be innocent, or guilty or you may say you do not know. But the truth is one of those things and it does not change with legal status.

  4. GC

    Thank you for this article. I have seen some Twitter conversations about the TC situation this week that astonished me. They also helped me to see more clearly how/why the church has failed miserably in dealing with child sexual abuse and other forms of abuse.

  5. Lea

    “6.Did the unhappy church in Arizona get the opportunity to pass on to other churches their warning about Chantry — how and why they thought he was not above reproach?”

    One thing I’ve been wondering, I feel certain that when someone applies to be a teacher they check references in some way. (I hope it’s the same for pastors). So this man got a teaching job…what happened when they called his former place of employment?

    There was, and is, a concern that giving ‘negative’ information on job applicants can result in legal problems in the business world. It can actually be hard to get out of companies when a person is fired. I wonder if that factored in.

  6. Reblogged this on Speakingtruthinlove's Blog.

  7. Jeff Crippen

    Barbara – as to this question: “Did the Arizona church try to tell others in their stream of Christendom, only to find their testimony discounted?” If you go to the ARBCA website and look at the list of member churches, you will find that Tom Chantry’s church in Wisconsin is a MEMBER of ARBCA. Chantry’s name as pastor of that church has been removed on the ARBCA website, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t still an ARBCA member. But here is the interesting and really troubling point: I believe Tom Chantry and his Wisconsin church were accepted into ARBCA membership in 2015.

    There is no way possible that ARBCA leaders knew nothing of the allegations against Chantry, at minimum the spanking charges in 2001. After all, ARBCA appointed a committee to mediate/investigate (something churches must not do. Leave investigating to the police instead). This means then plainly that the big wheels in ARBCA knowingly and willfully disregarded Chantry’s failure to be above reproach and granted him and his church ARBCA membership. Would they have done the same for a “nobody” type pastor? I doubt it. The Chantry name was feared more than the Lord was feared. This is plain old cronyism, it is disobedience to the Lord who commands us to apply His Word with impartiality in His church.

    • Jeff Crippen

      You will find another very interesting point by looking at the ARBCA website list of member churches. The church in Prescott, AZ where the charges against Chantry originate is NO LONGER a member of ARBCA. I am placing my educated bets on the assumption that the church in Prescott protested the admittance of Chantry into ARBCA membership because of the charges in the past and as we now know, the pending charges, and were totally disregarded by ARBCA. Chantry was welcomed in anyway. The Prescott church then resigned. Gee, haven’t we seen that dynamic at work someplace else? Like when an abuse victim goes to her church for help, is discounted, the abuser is enabled, and the victim is the one who has to leave!!

    • Thank-you, Jeff.

  8. Anonymous

    From the Devil,

    Oh Jeff, when will you ever learn? My children have no qualms about destroying Gods children and they enjoy living and breeding in the “church” environment….and you naïve ones make it so EASY for them. Just look at you Jeff, trying to shine the light of scripture in the world I’ve created for myself. My children (those who Jesus yells at in John 8:44) will calmly, with a controlled voice that is smooth as butter, discount your truth-telling. Let me just give you a small example of how EASY it is for me to do this….ready? Here goes…

    “Now some of you have been infected by a website known as A Cry for Justice…a certain “Pastor” (and I use the word loosely) Jeff Crippen is trying to expose what he calls “the lies of the evil one.” Now for those of you who have exposed yourselves to this heresy, you will find that you are now confused and the hope that you placed in us, your church family, is being tested. Let me assure you that OUR God is NOT the God of confusion–so clearly since your mind seems clouded and divided and you feel as though you are in a fog, is just a small sampling of how the Devil is able to harm Gods children. As we read in scripture, it is better for a milestone to be tied around the neck of someone than for them to lead these little ones astray, and I can assure that Pastor Crippen is one such as these!

    How can I be sure? Well, just look at his numbers. He unashamedly brags that his church is DOWN TO only 35 members. 35? And this man calls himself a man of God?! Surely God can scavenge up more than 35 members and send them to a true church of God! Why, if this fellow is preaching the truth found in God’s word surely many will be flocking to him, right? But where is everyone Pastor Jeff? Where is even the remnant that God can always keep for himself?

    Now this “Pastor” also writes books and has even started his own publishing company. This shows his rebellious nature to a T! Why did he have to start ANOTHER company? Aren’t there enough Christian ones out there now? Not according to good ole Pastor Jeff! Why, according to HIM nobody wanted to publish his stuff. Why do you think that is congregation? Is it because he has the truth and the rest of us–who collectively represent a very large number of highly educated people–are so uneducated and ungodly that (and he points this out continuously) we are just a bunch of wolves in sheep’s clothing hiding amongst the flock? Should I start growling and howling like a wolf and perhaps dress in a sweater or pajamas like Little Red Riding Hood’s grandmother?! (The congregation laughs.)

    Folks, you’ve known me and my wife and children for years now and we’ve consistently been here for you, so believe me when I tell you to stay away from this website lest you be tempted to turn from the One True God of scripture and be led astray by the REAL wolf hiding out fleecing the sheep of God’s Word. I am a sheepherder like Jesus, and I want those in my flock to know the TRUTH!”

    And there you have it Pastor Jeff, the beginning of my next Sunday sermon. It is no easy task you have undertaken trying to pry those of God’s children who I’ve managed to enslave within my church, out from under my rule. Although God’s children are fewer in number, they are INVALUABLE to God and to me as well because they have that core of truth known as the Holy Spirit which draws others to them. But I have managed to make them believe that they are nothing special and that they have no value unless they are allowing everyone to spiritually rape them. I’ve also been able to manipulate the few others among my sheep who also belong to Jesus, to drop them like a hot potato if they don’t get back in line.

    Oh yes Pastor Crippen, you have shown yourself to be a TRUE lover of God’s word which makes you an ENEMY of mine. There are many of my children in the church as you are discovering, and the bible clearly states that this is what will happen in the end times, but now you have an X on your back–we know who you are. And although all my brethren (psychopaths and demons) hate each other as much as we hate you–God’s children–we can sometimes work together to ensure the outcome we desire. Total and complete worship as god! The only thing that stops us is when people who belong to Jesus pray and speak the truth. In this we have found no defense. When those who belong to Jesus do this, we are scattered and stopped and exposed to the light of truth…good thing there seem to be so FEW of you who know the truth!!!!

    • standsfortruth

      You’ve got a knack for interpreting evil’s likely take on these situations Anonymous.

      Eerie but True with a familiar ring to it.

      Funny how the church and our abusers use the same tactics to undermine and silence their victims.
      It makes one realize that there must be more than a connection.

  9. Sunflower

    Of course the ‘anointed’ are the ones who decide who the anointed are, right? 🙂 The rest of us minions just get to say yea and amen.

  10. healinginhim

    A valuable post. So many have been scarred by, “There is a Code of Silence taught and enforced in the church and Evil is hiding out because of it.”

  11. Charis

    I have ever been fond of the the Narcotics Annonymous slogan: “We are only as sick as our secrets.”

    I find it applies in many situations. Indeed, the church is sick.

  12. Finding Answers


    From the original post Children are taught to obey their parents, and rightfully so; but even that obedience does not mean unconditional obedience no matter what a parent does. Family secrets lie buried.

    Unfortunately, obedience to parents, whether coming from the Christian, ‘c’hristian, or secular worlds, tends to imply unconditional obedience and unconditional respect. Very rarely is one taught critical thinking.

    If family secrets lie buried, the groundwork is in place to ease secrecy and cover-ups in other tangential realms.

    Soon after I left the home of my family of origin, I remember getting passionate when people glibly commented on the need to respect one’s parents. My reply was along the lines of “Parents need to earn the respect of their children.” (Another way of saying respect is not unconditional.)

    In later years, I learned of in instance in a secular institution where the #MeToo movement might have had a window of opportunity. I will never know the facts, only the “Boys Club” innuendo. My lens has changed, however, and the kaleidoscope has shifted. May I be forgiven for believing “the facts”.

  13. Todd Wilhelm included the full text of this post in his article Quiet! Don’t Break the Ninth Commandment! (Jan 2017). Todd was challenging R Scott Clark and others who were admonishing bloggers for writing about the sins of men like Tom Chantry and Tulllian Tchividjian.


  1. Serious Allegations: Did the Association of Reformed Baptist Churches of America Cover Up Tom Chantry’s Alleged Molestation of Children? | The Wartburg Watch 2016

Leave a Reply to debby Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: