Barbara Roberts ♦ 29th May 2021 ♦ 2 Comments
Here are the six posts in my Grounds for Divorce series.
1. The tangled mess of mistaken notions about what the Bible teaches on divorce
4. The Jewish divorce certificate gave women the right to remarry, but some men used it rule over women
5. Does Scripture differentiate between ‘putting away’ and ‘divorce’?
6. Divorce in Deuteronomy 21 gives dignity and rights to the woman
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Chatelaine on Gary Thomas’s book… | |
Barbara Roberts on Lordship Salvation versus Easy… | |
Finding Answers on What About that Perfect Family… | |
Barbara Roberts on What About that Perfect Family… | |
Reaching Out on Lordship Salvation versus Easy… | |
Young Christian on Lordship Salvation versus Easy… | |
Finding Answers on What About that Perfect Family… | |
Barbara Roberts on Making complaint . . . and get… | |
Finding Answers on Making complaint . . . and get… | |
Barbara Roberts on Abuse and Gender: When Brother… | |
Barbara Roberts on Steps to Freedom: Escaping Int… | |
Rebekah on Steps to Freedom: Escaping Int… | |
Reaching Out on Steps to Freedom: Escaping Int… | |
Rebekah on Steps to Freedom: Escaping Int… | |
Barbara Roberts on John MacArthur and R.C. Sproul… |
The definition of abuse: A pattern of coercive control (ongoing actions or inactions) that proceeds from a mentality of entitlement to power, whereby, through intimidation, manipulation and isolation, the abuser keeps his* target subordinated and under his control. This pattern can be emotional, verbal, psychological, spiritual, sexual, financial, social and physical. Not all these elements need be present, e.g., physical abuse may not be part of it.
The definition of domestic abuser: a family member or dating partner (current or ex) who has a profound mentality of entitlement to the possession of power and control over the one s/he* chooses to mistreat. This mentality of entitlement defines the very essence of the abuser. The abuser believes he is justified in using evil tactics to obtain and maintain that power and control.
* Sometimes the genders are reversed—see our tag for 'male survivors' (tags tab in the top menu).
To say that abusers cannot change removes responsibility for sin. They can change, but the vast majority choose not to, which is what the experts state. When God punishes them, their punishment is just. Abusers have options for treatment and are accountable.
Once the marriage covenant is broken through abuse, the abused partner does not need to stay in the marriage waiting for the abuser to change. The abuser's recovery is a separate issue and his change is his own responsibility, not his wife's. This is the mistake most churches make. These churches have over-sentimentalized marriage and are legalists.
A Cry for Justice is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program. The tiny amount we receive from Amazon helps pay our annual fees to WordPress to ensure the blog is free of ads, and to keep our URL cryingoutforjustice.blog.
It is almost as if a series on “What Actually is Marriage?” is also needed, since so many people think that marriage includes the scenario of an abused spouse being forced to remain in the continual vow-breaking, covenant-mocking conditions being pawned off as “a picture of Jesus and His Bride.”
Where2or3, in this post I discuss the purpose of marriage and critique the mistaken ideas which you mentioned.
What is the purpose of marriage? Is it to display Christ’s love for the church?
You might also like to read Avid Reader’s criticisms of a book by Tim and Kathy Keller: The Meaning of Marriage by Tim & Kathy Keller — a review by Avid Reader