A Cry For Justice

Awakening the Evangelical Church to Domestic Violence and Abuse in its Midst

Psychopath, Sociopath — is there a difference?

Recently there was some discussion at this blog about the differences (if any) between the terms psychopath and sociopath.  (The discussion was in the comments thread of the post My Own Private Dexter.)

I contacted Dr George Simon Jr, PhD, psychologist, author and blogger (also his articles here) to ask his opinion on the meanings of those two terms. Here is Dr Simon’s response, re-formatted by me for ease of reading. Over to you, Dr Simon.

* * *

The concept of “psychopathy” was introduced by Cleckley in his landmark book The Mask of Sanity. What Cleckley noticed in a certain subset of antisocial personalities (social parasites and criminals) was that some individuals had the uncanny ability to appear “normal” or even “charming” while having so little human empathy and so little conscience that they could use and abuse others without the slightest compunction or remorse. He also noticed that their tendency to lie was uniquely pathological in that it appeared nonsensical (i.e. they lied even when the truth would suffice). He and others considered this to be an extraordinary pathology of the mind, and a derangement bordering on a type of insanity — hence the title of the book “mask of sanity.”

Shortly after Cleckley’s work, the term psychopathy fell into disfavor among professionals and many preferred the label “sociopathic” to describe social predators. While professionals agreed that there did seem to be a unique personality type devoid of empathy and conscience, the core pathology of these individuals began to be seen more as a severe type of social dysfunction as opposed to a derangement of mind. And sociopathy was viewed by most as the most extreme form of antisocial (i.e. “against society”) personality disorder.

In any case, both “psychopath” and “sociopath” refer to a unique subset of individuals with antisocial personalities. And whereas your “garden variety” antisocial personality is pretty much a social parasite, frequently either living in disregard of the law or actively violating it and engaging in wide range of impulsive, reckless behaviors, psychopaths or sociopaths can in fact lead outwardly appearing respectable lives yet have no conscience about using and abusing others. They are the archetypal “snakes in suits.” An example would be Bernie Madoff.

Now if this weren’t confusing enough, there is even more confusion about terms:

  • lay persons as well as clinicians frequently use the terms antisocial personality and sociopath as if they were synonymous
  • some folks prefer to use the term dissocial personality to describe recalcitrant antisocial personalities
  • others want to reserve the term dissocial to those with specific genetic predispositions to antisocial behavior
  • many lay persons use the term antisocial to describe someone who’s being stand-offish or ostracizing themselves from a group, when in fact, asocial would be the best term to describe someone who naturally lacks interest in social interaction, and avoidant would be the best term to describe someone who actively retreats from social involvements.
  • many folks confuse the terms psychopathic and psychotic  [for Simon’s disambiguation of these terms, go here.]

The very best source on all this is the renowned Theodore Millon and a comprehensive discussion of these issues can be found in any of his numerous works, one good example of which is Personality Disorders in Modern Life.

* * *

Additional Notes from Barb:

Dr George Simon’s post Predators Among Us: The Psychopaths  explores this terminology issue in more depth. Here’s a brief quote from the article:

. . . disturbances of character vary in type and intensity.  And long before it became fashionable to view certain personalities as “almost a psychopath,” I proposed that there was one type of personality (the covert-aggressive) who had all of the manipulative characteristics of a psychopath but couldn’t quite rise to the level of character pathology to be classified a genuine conscienceless predator.

The same post touches on Gavin de Becker’s thesis (The Gift of Fear [*Affiliate link]) and the TV series Dexter. There, have I whetted your appetite enough?

You might also like to read Simon’s post Character Spectrum Disorders where he further canvasses the moveable feast of terminology, including the term narcissistic personality.

To wrap this up, here’s a quote from Simon’s article Psychopathy: Is It Really Everywhere?

it’s crucial to remember that along that continuum of character disturbance, there are many conscience-deficient, abusive, exploitation-oriented, self-absorbed, and manipulative individuals who are not severely disturbed enough to be rightly labeled psychopathic, but who are nonetheless character-impaired enough to leave a trail of badly bruised victims having the misfortune to be involved with them in some way.

* Amazon affiliate link — ACFJ  gets a small percentage if you purchase via this link


  1. Jeff Crippen

    I wonder if Esau was a biblical example of a sociopath —

    Heb 12:15-17 See to it that no one fails to obtain the grace of God; that no “root of bitterness” springs up and causes trouble, and by it many become defiled; (16) that no one is sexually immoral or unholy like Esau, who sold his birthright for a single meal. (17) For you know that afterward, when he desired to inherit the blessing, he was rejected, for he found no chance to repent, though he sought it with tears.

    Poor Esau, it would seem at first glance. And yet we know that sociopaths can turn on the faucet of tears quite readily, but without any true empathy, remorse or pang of conscience. That would require some feeling for others. The sociopath lacks any of that feeling.

    • UPDATE Sept 2021: I have come to believe that Jeff Crippen does not practise what he preaches. He vilely persecuted an abuse victim and spiritually abused many other people in the Tillamook congregation. Go here to read the evidence. Jeff has not gone to the people that he spiritually and emotionally abused. He has not apologised to them, let alone asked for their forgiveness.


      Good thought, Jeff.

  2. thepersistentwidow

    I am very thankful for Dr. Simon sharing his insight with us. His books have helped me make sense of some of the chaos I lived through and have prepared me for inevitable future encounters with character-impared people. HIs insight has made me more careful about who to trust and that is a good thing!

Leave a comment. It's ok to use a made up name (e.g Anon37). For safety tips read 'New Users Info' (top menu). Tick the box if you want to be notified of new comments.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: