Abuse and 1 Corinthians 7 Desertion
UPDATE Sept 2021: I have come to believe that Jeff Crippen does not practise what he preaches. He vilely persecuted an abuse victim and spiritually abused many other people in the Tillamook congregation. Go here to read the evidence. Jeff has not gone to the people that he spiritually and emotionally abused. He has not apologised to them, let alone asked for their forgiveness.
[July 15, 2022: There have been some changes made to this post. For more information, read the Editors’ notes at the bottom of the post. Editors.]
(1 Corinthians 7:15 ESV) (15) But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace.
There is nothing new in this post that we have not mentioned before. In fact, I believe you will also find that Barbara Roberts made mention of it in her book, Not Under Bondage [*Affiliate link]. So this is really just a reminder to all of us.
The Presbyterian Church in America (R.C. Sproul’s denomination) declared in an extensive position paper on divorce and remarriage (1992) that desertion as grounds for biblical divorce includes desertion effected by abuse even if the abuser is still physically living in the house. You can read it for yourself at:
In the copy that I read online the applicable section was on page 227. It is in the section entitled Applying Paul’s Instruction About Desertion Today” (Section II, paragraph E, subsection 4).
This does not mean that we agree with all of the conclusions of this paper, but it is important for all of us to know that the PCA has already concluded that abuse is indeed biblical desertion. So when we take this position we are by no means acting as rebellious lone rangers who are resolved to do our own thing.
We should take this information and put it right in front of any Christian who is insisting that the only truly biblical position is that divorce is not permissible for abuse. No, the PCA is not infallible. But it is remarkable, nevertheless, that these men who were assigned to study the issue of marriage and divorce came to this conclusion.
And that is good news for all of us.
[July 15, 2022: Editors’ notes:
—For some comments made prior to July 15, 2022 that quoted from the post, the text in the comment that was quoted from the post might no longer be an exact match.
—For some comments made prior to July 15, 2022 that quoted from the post, the text in the comment that was quoted from the post might no longer be found in the post.
If you would like to compare the text in the comments made prior to July 15, 2022 that quoted from the post to the post as it is now (July 15, 2022), click here [Internet Archive link] for the most recent Internet Archive copy of the post.]